Modern cloud environments involve thousands of decisions and dozens of tools, made and used by people across DevOps, IT, security teams, vendors, and even newly acquired companies – all configuring and changing infrastructure in real time. This inherent complexity isn’t just an anecdote; it’s now the default state of cloud computing, and it brings very real security risks.

‍

The Reality of Cloud Complexity

Cloud infrastructure today is a patchwork quilt of different services, configurations, and practices. Most organizations have a mix of approaches and legacy habits. For example, it’s common to find:

• Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Some resources defined in code templates (Terraform, CloudFormation, etc.) for consistency.
• “ClickOps” and Manual Changes: Other resources created or tweaked manually through web consoles or CLI commands – the “just this one quick fix” scenarios.
• Legacy Scripts & Processes: Perhaps the organization uses legacy or outdated processes their environments.
• Multiple Clouds & Accounts: Many companies operate in multiple public clouds or many accounts – over 79% of organizations use more than one cloud provider, which increases complexity and the likelihood of misconfiguration. No two cloud setups are identical, even on the same provider, especially after mergers or acquisitions.
• Tool Sprawl: To manage various aspects (identity, network, containers, etc.), teams employ numerous tools. In fact, Gartner research suggests an average enterprise uses 60–70 different security tools from 10–15 vendors – a testament to how sprawling and varied cloud tooling can become.

This messy, constraint-driven reality is a far cry from the neat diagrams we often see in theory. And critically, every one of these choices and changes – each piece of that patchwork – carries the potential for a configuration mistake or security gap. Cloud complexity at scale means mistakes are inevitable, even for well-intentioned teams. It only takes one misconfigured S3 bucket or an overly permissive access policy for an attacker to find a way in.

When IaC scanning Isn’t Enough

When cloud security comes up in conversation, the discussion often turns to technology and best practices: use Infrastructure-as-Code scanning (“IaC scanning”), run vulnerability scans before deployment, and soon. These are important practices – they aim to catch issues early in the development pipeline. Shifting left by enforcing security during development and CI/CD can indeed prevent some errors from ever reaching production.

However, these approaches assume a level of clean, uniform process that many organizations simply don’t have. They presume everything is defined as code and goes through a controlled pipeline. In reality, as we saw, most orgs don’t look like that – they are far more complex. Some of your infrastructure might go through code review and scanning, but other changes happen outside that pipeline entirely. For example, an engineer might urgently open a port or spin up a new resource via the cloud console to fix an immediate problem, bypassing the usual IaC process. Or a team might integrate athird-party service with default configurations. These out-of-bandchanges mean that even with rigorous IaC scanning efforts, not everything is covered, and that’s where enforcement comes in handy.

The result is that security teams often find themselves addressing issues in a reactive way. They deploy the app or infrastructure, then later discover misconfigurations or vulnerabilities in the live environment and scramble to fix them. It’s a cycle of chasing problems after they’ve already gone live, which one industry commentary described as an “endless loop: deploy resources, scan for vulnerabilities, scramble to remediate”.

The Risk of Reactive Cloud Security

The “cloud is just someone else’s computer” quip misses a critical point: when that “computer” (cloud environment) is misconfigured, you bear the risk. And waiting until after deployment to catch security gaps means there’s a window of exposure where things can go very wrong. Unfortunately, we have plenty of evidence that misconfigurations in the cloud are not a trivial edge case – they are a leading cause of security failures and breaches.

Consider these sobering facts: Misconfigurations are the cause of most cloud breaches, by many estimates. Gartner analysts predicted that through 2025, 99% of cloud security failures would be the customer’s fault – primarily due to misconfiguration. In practical terms, that means simply having data in “someone else’s computer” (the cloud) isn’t inherently unsafe, but a simple mistake in how you set it up (open S3 buckets, improper access controls, etc.) can be devastating. Studies show human error (like an admin ticking the wrong box or forgetting public network access open) is responsible for the vast majority of these cloud misconfiguration incidents.

Real-world breach examples reinforce this risk. In December 2024, a major data exposure at Volkswagen affected some 800,000 vehicles’ data. The root cause? A cloud storage misconfiguration by a third-party provider. In a complex cloud ecosystem with multiple parties involved, it only took one partner misconfiguring an environment to leak sensitive information. Complexity amplifies risk: the more people, tools, and components touching your cloud, the higher the chance something is mis-set and creates an opening.

Reactive security – finding and fixing issues only after deployment –means such misconfigurations might linger exposed for days, weeks, or months before someone notices. During that time, attackers can and do exploit them opportunistically. The cost of reactive fixes is also high. As one cloud security expert noted, “corrective maintenance will cost you”, whereas going proactive can save a lot of costs down the road.

Proactive Cloud Security: The Only Way Forward

In a cloud landscape where complexity isn’t an edge case but the default, organizations must shift their mindset from purely reactive to proactive security. What does proactive cloud security look like in practice? It means preventing misconfigurations and vulnerabilities from ever reaching your live environment. Instead of chasing problems in production, you establish guardrails and automated checks that catch issues at the time of deployment.

Several strategies and emerging practices embody this proactive approach

• Policy Enforcement at Deployment: Rather than just scanning code and hoping developers fix issues, the correct approach is the use enforcement tools that scan configurations during the deployment process and block deployments that violate security policies. This ensures that risky settings (e.g. an S3 bucket left public or a database without encryption) are corrected before the resource is live. As the saying goes, prevention is better than cure – detecting security issues only after deployment is costly, time-consuming, and “tempts fate”. Proactive policy enforcement flips that script.
• Technology-Agnostic Guardrails: A proactive approach must accommodate the messy reality of mixed environments. New cloud security platforms are adapting to organizations’ existing stacks – whether resources are defined via IaC or created manually – to provide consistent protection. This is crucial: security measures can’t only work in idealized all-IaC environments; they need to handle ad hoc changes and third-party integrations too. By being agnostic to how a cloud resource was created, these guardrails catch misconfigurations whether they come from Terraform code or from clickOps clicking in the console.

Crucially, embracing proactive security is not about slowing down innovation or adding bureaucratic gates – it’s about empowering development and cloud teams to move fast safely. When guardrails are in place, developers can deploy quickly without fear, knowing that blatant mistakes will be caught automatically. Security teams, for their part, no longer need to manually comb through every deployment or frantically monitor dashboards for issues; they can trust the system to enforce baseline security and focus on higher-level strategy. This alignment turns security from a roadblock into are liable safety net that supports the business, while not requiring much – just setting the policies upfront and seeing them enforced, rather than investing time and resources in fixing the gaps.

Conclusion

The old joke about the cloud being “someone else’s computer” misses the truth: in today’s cloud, complexity is king, and with complexity comes risk. Most organizations operate cloud environments that are part code, part clicks, part legacy – in short, part chaos. In such an environment, trying to bolt on security after the fact is a losing battle, akin to catching water after it’s already leaked out. The focus must shift to building security into the fabric of how we deploy and manage cloud resources. By catching misconfigurations and policy violations at the source – before they become incidents – companies can break out of the endless cycle of deploy-and-patch.

Proactive cloud security isn’t just a buzzword or a luxury for the elite few; it’s the only approach that truly works when complexity is the norm. As cloud infrastructure continues to sprawl and accelerate, organizations that invest in preventing issues (rather than endlessly reacting to them) will be the ones to stay ahead of threats. In the final analysis, the cloud may indeed be running on “someone else’s computers,” but keeping it secure is very much our responsibility – and proactive security is how we own up to that responsibility in a complex cloud world.

‍